no, why would you want to?
You have to boot to an X-server to run NX anyway, right?
True. NX requires X11.
Why not just use the native X server to display what is running on the ltsp server. Also, you can mix local running apps with server running apps in this way. If a person wanted to run NX or VNC on ltsp, they can. Why would you take away
Jim McQuillan is one of the founders of ltsp. He had this to say about NX. <quote> NX is fine for low-bandwidth connections, but it isn't so great over a high-spead lan. Also, NX imposes huge resource usage on the server, when you run lots of users. I like NX, but it has it's place, and the LAN isn't it. Jim McQuillan jam@Ltsp.org </quote> B-) On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:36 am, Alexey Eremenko wrote: options
instead of enabling them?
But NX is much faster on performance side. + it's much easier to setup & work with. With NX, as with X11 you *can* mix local & remote apps even for different platforms ! (eg Windows & Linux).
NX is simply better in every aspect - be it security, performance, ease of use, whatever you choose....