houghi wrote:
I personally would drop the numbers and go with dates. e.g. `SUSE 2005 Spring` instead of SUSE 10.1.
numbers are good if used as they need I already said some time ago than 10.1 is more an "11", given the new update system. and I'm not sure this was a good decision, because the debugging seems very hard :-( anyway, if SUSE Linux shall be out at regular pace (said 8 month last time), why not a date. However, the Mandriva system of one major issue by year seems not so bad, it could be better to have a better bugfix on the stable branch and keep unstable some months more testing jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos