3 Jan
2006
3 Jan
'06
00:08
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 18:51 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Dave Howorth
[01-02-06 18:47]: I don't think this is it. I can't see any sign of lp or lprng.
You should. lp is installed by cups-client and necessary. lprng *is* a different printing system and would conflict with cups, or bsdlp...
Sorry it's late and I'm not writing clearly again. You mean that /usr/bin/lp should be there? Yes, it is. I meant that when I grep running processes I don't see anything lp related (e.g. lpd), so I don't think there's an install conflict with daemons. Cheers, Dave