-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Monday 2006-01-02 at 18:47 -0600, Eric Hines wrote:
I think not...
I was unclear here--I meant that the current retry had my effort to remove the offending.... And apparently I failed at that; the retry got labeled, too.
I know - next time, use your editor search feature ;-)
My wild guess is that your ISP is blacklisted.
Expand the headers. What a concept. I should have thought of that.... As to the ISP being blacklisted, I don't think so for two reasons: one is purely hope: my ISP is ComCast, and they're generally better than that. They're not AT&T, either then or now. The other is more concrete: I've sent other emails to the list during this time frame that haven't been tagged.
It is blacklisted, in fact: see my other recent email in this thread. Nothing "serious", they are reported because they ignore two types of RFC, and thus are listed in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org and whois.rfc-ignorant.org. The score is not enough to trigger unless you also hit another thing, as containing a dot biz domain name somewhere in the text. However... although not respecting the RFC is a "Bad Thing", I'm not sure being listed there is a spamminess indicator, nor that it should be given so high score. SA scores are given automatically with a process I don't understand; perhaps I'll try to read about it.
But don't worry too much, I'm not deterred by the "spam" word in the subject, nor will many listers here, I hope. You should be grateful that your emails was simply tagged and not deleted unceremoniously, as it was done not long ago! ;-p
Good. I was afraid most folks would do what I would have done if I knew enough to be a contributer--look past the spam labels, or actually filter them out.
I have been labeled that way before, so I'm sensitive to the problem. If I see that label in the list, my curiosity rises ;-) See how many people are talking about this instead of your problem! Next time, I bet you don't say a thing :-p
As as your "real" problem, I don't know.
And you're one of the geniuses here. I don't know if I'm encouraged or discouraged....
Neither! X-) Each one has its parcel of knowledge. Of course I know about networks, but not formally and I'm not confident enough to guess at your problem, or not today, at least, nothing clicked yet. - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFDudrqtTMYHG2NR9URAgq+AJsG990OEOszeM50vpH0LX1z6k7vWQCgg3U+ OLcSiIE2hg0k2SHo0Mh6dYQ= =5Nqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----