Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, jdd wrote:
I don't think this is really necessary and reasonable. It would be much better to try to avoid having humours in the air, by communicating in a more transparent and open way. Anyway, are you saying that you don't trust the @suse.de people on this list - why? ;)
it's not a matter of _my_ opinion. I think I begin to know you all and appreciate :-), but reading here the threads about rumors it seems not so easy to stop them. I had quite a harsh contact with my LUG on this subject. Many people _like_ rumors. I'm not aware of all what have been said, but I think there will probably been an initial mistake from Novell, may be not explaining the gnome/kde stuff here *before* official release or making the communicate not clear enough. I want only as a proof the fact that this come again in spanish later. (of course my own mail was a quote, not a fact - you see this is "hot" :-() and I'm very happy with Novell involvement, but Large companies (I don't say that for Novell) have accustommed us to not be so trustfull. I think it's important than there is _one_ trustee, because if there are many voices, necessarily they are not all exactly the same and this gives dubt. when you say "this can't be", I'm sure you think this really but do you really know what is about? (don't think it's me that asks, but any customer) clearly there are many Novell corps here, and very good persons. But anybody should know when they speak freely and when they are Novells voice (may be a different e-mail for official comments) sorry, I'm not english native, so I sometime wonder if I can make me clear enough. I don't wan to upset anybody. jdd -- pour m'écrire, aller sur: http://www.dodin.net