-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Monday 2005-10-17 at 20:34 -0500, Scott Jones wrote:
Is it a bug of df? Am I getting it wrong somewhere?
From the FAQ at http://namesys.com/faq.html#du:
"du says ReiserFS makes space efficiency worse.
Use df not du, or use "raw" option for du if your du supports that. st_blocks summed up is less accurate than st_size for ReiserFS because we pack tails, and st_blocks rounds numbers up."
Note that du as provided in the GNU coreutils doesn't support the "raw" option.
I see. It makes sense now. Well, thanks to you and Randall for the clarification. - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFDVQA+tTMYHG2NR9URAoooAJ42Ao65eDN3ajjCBoF56EA0o68BdwCfQopm C7C3pp7U9okKdQss6TKxIes= =U9CD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----