On Thursday 04 August 2005 14:46, James Knott wrote:
Peter B Van Campen wrote:
On Thursday 04 August 2005 14:16, James Knott wrote:
Jerry Feldman wrote:
The bottom line is that Darl McBride and company are not only ruining the former Caldera, but doing their best to hurt the entire Unix/Linux marketplace, which might be their objective.
I wonder what their lawyers think about the Novell suit, particularly regarding McBride trying to get the copyrights from Novell and also about that software engineer's memo? Did they know about them or were they surprised?
My question is what happens, should the lawyers find out that the client has lied? That there really is no case? Somehow, I don't get the impression that David Boies would proceed with a case he knows to be fraudulent.
Well, to a lawyer, 'truth' is only established by a judge or jury. He advances the clients 'suit' as best he can. If lawyers only defended 'innocent' or 'righteous' clients how would courts work? I, personally , think they chose Bois to make SCO appear to be more distant from M$ than it really was. He has mot only opposed M$ he also defended IBM on unrelated matters. PeterB