On Tuesday 10 May 2005 05:46 am, Gideon Hallett wrote:
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 14:26, Ken Schneider wrote:
The only purpose of this site and their paper version is to stir up controversy. Most of their stories are full of "no truth" and "half truth" stories. If any of their stories are based on actual fact I would be surprised.
That's not fair. The Inq is a decent enough rag; and Mike Magee (who also founded the Register) is apparently an OK bloke.
What the Inquirer is not is the whole, complete, and unvarnished truth. It's a tabloid site, and includes speculation, rumour and "we heard $foo from $bar". It holds gossip; some of which is correct and some of which isn't.
cheers,
Gideon.
So then it would seem that Ken and Gideon agree 100% on the quality and believability of the rag in question.... Next !!..... -- _____________________________________ John Andersen