Wed, 16 Feb 2005, by ptilopteri@gmail.com:
* Andreas Philipp
[02-16-05 16:19]: El Mié 16 Feb 2005 14:54, Patrick Shanahan escribió:
Not following this procedure destroys the 'message threading' for those email clients having that capability.
That's interesting, as under my KMail the OP's message appeared as firts of a new thread. Didn't notice any thread highjacking, although the references to another thread's messages are appearant in its headers.
You will not see the other messages from the thread if you have already deleted them. The new post would *then* appear as a *new* thread.
Not in Mutt you wouldn't. You'd see an arrow before the subject in the index, telling you something's fishy. It totally amazes me why people find this reply/delete stuff/add stuff easier then just put the list-address in the addressbook and use that for a new post. But then, I see people do a lot of whacky things (mostly involving their beloved CTS tool, aka mouse) that takes 'm double the time that I need. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 9.2 + Jabber: muadib@jabber.xs4all.nl Kernel 2.6.8 + MSN: twe-msn@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl See headers for PGP/GPG info. +