2 Dec
2004
2 Dec
'04
18:27
The Thursday 2004-12-02 at 09:37 +0100, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
Third alternative is not to use backup MX at all, since clever MTA should have a resending que for the mail somewhere between 4 to 5 days. So mail should not be getting lost. Since the spammers almots always use the backup MX to deliver their junk no backup MX also means less junk :-)
Why is that, what's the difference? The email, bona-fide, should reach destination regardless of using the main or the backup MX, shouldn't it? I don't see why spammers prefer the backup MX... :-? -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson