I too have been having issues. I was pretty disappointed in the 9.2 release so far. Nothing but headaches doing install's on my 64bit servers. A few just kernel panic at initial install and nothing done can seem to correct it. However 9.1 installs without a problem on the same machines. Brad Dameron Linux Systems Administrator SeaTab Software www.seatab.com On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 15:19, David Johanson wrote:
Doug B wrote:
On Monday 20 December 2004 02:10 pm, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
We've moved several of our central servers to SuSe 9.2. And beyond a few run-of-the-mill problems it has proven to be a good quality solution.
I have to agree. SuSe 9.2 has been the best Linux distro I've used.
Looking back at the list archives for the past two years, it looks to me like there is a pretty good jump in activity around each new release. I don't see that this time, at least not yet. Could that mean that fewer people are having problems?
Doug
This has definitely not been my experience as chronicled on this list. What has been surprising to me is the almost total lack of response to the problems I've been detailing such as phantom drives being listed, drives not being found, and apparently total inability to deal with ATAPI zip drives. At this point I'm looking into other distributions. Up through 9.0 I felt like SuSE was THE distribution to own, but I'm beginning to change my opinions more and more with each subsequent release since 9.0
dave -- David C. Johanson Linux Counter # 116410 Powered by SuSE Linux 7.3
People who behold a phenomenon will often extend their thinking beyond it; people who merely hear about the phenomenon will not be moved to think at all. -- Goethe