On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 19:58 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 November 2004 19.44, Siebe ytsma wrote:
Recognize this warning? I have read a lot of so called solutions in mailinglists, forums etcetera. Unfortunately these solutions were based on guessing and not research or facts.
As I believe I'm the only one who have commented on it on this list, should I take that as a personal insult? I don't do guess work. Which part of
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=suse-linux-e&m=109357888210260&w=2
or
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=suse-linux-e&m=109923128432028&w=2
is not based on research or facts?
Solution:
Correction: Hack, not solution
Move the files libqtpixmap.la and libqtpixmap.so from
In rpm based distributions, it's bad form to just move files around, it will invalidate the rpm database. Besides which, you could potentially introduce subtle errors if the new lib isn't fully binary compatible
Well, I followed your suggestion, Anders, and recompiled QtPixmap a few days ago. Problem solved. Thank you. David -- Registered Linux User No 207521 The Linux Counter: http://counter.li.org/ "The above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head."