Chadley Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2004 14:19, Felix Miata wrote:
Bob S wrote:
Might want to consider this for your next hard drive purchase. A little late. I bought WD 120 GB last fall
I suspect might be giving me problems. They ONLY have it for the windoz flavors. I don't believe it !!! As others have said, it runs from a floppy so why is that so horrible? If it is because of a Gates aversion, it might not matter anyway since the DOS is not the MS DOS
I do. WD is the winmodem of ATA drives: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12078 I had to read carefuly before I finally understood what you meant. Those slimeballs!
Leendert Meyer wrote:
I hope Western Digital does not go the same way as Asus.
Too late. They did that about 12 years ago. I give up. Can anyone explain what that meant?
Yes the first version of MDK10 had a habit of destrying WD hard drives, I'm because of this "winmodem" problem?
This thread might not be off topic at all. When I upgraded the PC containing the WD drives to SuSE 9.1, had a lot of trouble. I just didn't feel motivated to go though the process of troubleshooting so I went back to SuSE 9.0. Since SuSE 9.1 is the 2.6 kernel while 9.0 uses 2.4, is it possible that with the new kernel, the WD issues came to the surface? Damon Register