Thanks for the info. I've been using Pro for a while, but I have lately been wondering if I should have installed SLES instead. The main reason is some of the comments I've seen in the suse_oracle mailing list about Oracle problems with the 9.x releases. That had me wondering whether Oracle was getting short shrift on the Pro side and that maybe I'd have to stay at an older version (and maybe have to switch to SLES). From what you and others are saying, it's just a matter of early version glitches that get ironed out over time. So maybe (as other's have advised), I just need to stay a version behind to allow for all of these glitches to get resolved. Then I could install the next version and immediately download and apply all of the patches before cranking up Oracle. I don't mind being a little behind in getting all of the new SuSE capabilities in order to get a more stable platform, as long as I know that stable platform is not to far around the corner. Thanks, Greg -----Original Message----- From: Jerome R. Westrick [mailto:jerry@westrick.com] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 6:41 AM To: Suse Users Subject: Re: [SLE] SLES vs SL Pro Not really happy with the answers do far... IMHO... SLES is certified. That is very important when you want to get support from oracle, IBM or something like that... SLES is designed for Enterprise database servers, Application servers, etc. The updates are more selective and the software is generally older versions (to garuntee stability). SLES is what the Tax Dept. of Nicaragua, and El Salvador use to run thier main stream apps (for example). The pro is as close to the cutting edge new developement / new features as you want to get, (There is some discussion that 9.1 is too close to the edge!). Here the emphasis is on getting the newest soonest, with a reasonable amount of stability. This is what I use for daily work, since I want / need the newest patches for MSN messenger, want the lastest enhancements to Open Office, and Samba 3.0 features, USB haddisk support, USB camera, Firewire Video DV interface, etc. (Theese things are not as important in the SLES Enterpirse server, and you don't really eant them on your servers!). I build SOHO servers with Profesional, but am waiting to update them to 9.1 for it to become more stable... I've never bought/used/seen the Personal. The samving of some 50$ does not seam to be worth the missing manual, never mind the missing flexability... That's my humble Opinion... Jerry On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 06:04, Greg Wallace wrote:
I'm fairly new to Linux and was wondering about how far down in the software layers the difference between SLSE and SL Pro run. Do they both use the same kernel? Do they both use the same Borne shell? Is it just the additional layers on top of those for supporting server functionality that makes up the difference between them?
Thanks, Greg Wallace
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com