14 Jun
2003
14 Jun
'03
05:11
http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001104659-03-012299.txt&FilePath=%5C2003%5C06%5C13%5C&CoName=SCO+GROUP+INC&FormType=10-Q&RcvdDate=6%2F13%2F2003&pdf= And this little tidbit for /. The Company’s SCOsource licensing revenue to date has been generated from license agreements that are non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free, paid up licenses to utilize the Company’s UNIX source code, including the right to sublicense. How do they intend to revoke IBMs UNIX license if they say in their own 10k filing that so far only perpetual deals have been made? http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/13/1532217 Let's see what else we can find in SCO's document of sooth saying! Cheers, Curtis.