30 May
2003
30 May
'03
17:25
On May 30, 2003 01:08 pm, James Mohr wrote:
Very valid point. There are many, many places the code could have come from. However, it terms of "stealing" the code, one does not need to have stolen it to have it taint the Linux code. All one needs to have done is seen the code and used what you saw (even without copying it 1:1). Also what is the statute of limitation on that? It's been 7 years since the real SC had it last.
The main problem with this tatic is you need to admit SCO is right. You then try and rely on other issues to get away with what SCO is claiming. Better to start from the point that SCO is wrong. Nick