Hi, Just a question running around me since this stuff began. How in the world SCO can prove that somebody has stolen its code?. SCO UNIX is a closed source. Linux is public and 100% available for all human beings. Then, assuming someone shows a coincidence in code, any of these scenarios are possible a) SCO copies part of LINUX code and then Claims it has been stolen. b) Both Linux and SCO/UNIX derived from same source/books/educational formation. c) Actually some SCO code has been intentionaly sliped to LINUX. I personally believe the chance off c) is rather small. I think the Open Source kind to do the things this time is an advantage. Everybody can follow the history of Linux' source. Can SCO to say the same?. They have to demonstrate Linux is culpable, otherwise is inocent. Guillermo
The following is a very interesting article produced by Eric Raymond in response to SCO claims.
---------------------------------------------------------
-- Guillermo Ballester Valor registered linux user #117181 gbv@oxixares.com Ogijares, Granada SPAIN