People please, end this! As already pointed out by others Euro is not a "normal" word but an invented name. It is not an English word, it is no language's word, it is a made up, invented, always staying the same no matter in what language word. Thus those who invented it made up the rules for it too. These rules have nothing to do with the common rules in the language the word Euro is used in. The ruleis that no matter if used as singular or plural word, it stays Euro. Grammar does not apply in any language to the word Euro. If people use Euros as plural, they will be understood and it might be ok for colloquial, however it is formally not correct and those who know better should not use it in that way. I guess after this thread all of you know better. I am also aware that a lot do not care, fair enough, but the rules for that word are not made up by me, you or anyone but the inventors of that word, i.e. there is no use of any kind of dicussion, as it is a decree without any need for reasoning to it. Concluding, those who care about a correct use of a language care and learn, as everybody does, because nobody is perfect. Those who do not care about the correct use of a language or simply cannot accept any rules because they feel threatened in their personal freedom or whatsoever, just keep on using Euros, knowing better.
To those who think that a word should not be given any static rules that apply to it, just think of all the exeptions that are made in any language to general grammar. See the word Euro as another exception, as the word information is, or news as examples for the English language. Who would argue that it is correct to say informations? It's the same as with Euro, there is no sense in argueing, it is a rule just for that word and that's all there is to it.
Sven
I asked for an end to this thread some messages ago. You decided to continue it. This list is for users of windows xp. Only. Please do not write off topic. Cheers, Mick.