I personally don't have any experience in this area, but your message reminded me of an article that I thought might be useful. (You may have already read it.) I would image that you could contact him and swap implementation ideas. (Oh, I got this from my LinuxToday newsletter, which I really like: http://ww.linuxtoday.com ) ZDNET: CITY SAVES WITH LINUX, THIN CLIENTS "The sun is shining on Linux in the Florida Panhandle. At a time when Microsoft Windows dominates the corporate desktop, the City of Largo has chosen Linux..." COMPLETE STORY: http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2860180,00.html hope that helps. good luck with your setup! Lowell Alleman
-----Original Message----- From: Togan Muftuoglu [SMTP:toganm@dinamizm.com] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:57 PM To: SLE Subject: [SLE] Which filesystem for Terminal Server
Hi,
I know this topic comes quite often but I would like to hear from people who hve a similar case.
I am building a Terminal Server which will provide Desktop enviroment to thin clients of roughly 200 users. They will all be using graphical login and be running either KDE or GNOME along with the graphical Mail clients ( no mutt :-( no pine ) and mostly Office programs be either Koffice or Staroffice or OpenOffice.
There has been numerous times various comparions of different filesystems ResiserFS, XFS ext3 etc.
What I would like to hear is from users who have a similar setup and their experience with their choosen filesystem.
If I don't hear its obvious nobody is running a system like that :-)
--
Togan Muftuoglu Unofficial SuSE FAQ Maintainer http://dinamizm.ath.cx
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com
Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com