No, not a bit of bias to his publication or testimony... not one bit. Well, except for the fact that he might make a living off of grants, such as those thrown his way by M$. And there's no way he would ever say anything pro-M$ that wasn't completely true and accurate cause he's not influenced by any potential endowments or grants in the future by private industry such as M$. Hmmmm..... So how much academic credibility this testimony will garner the good professor? Cheers, Curtis On Thursday 18 April 2002 09:41, Fred A. Miller wrote:
Microsoft witness admits ties to software giant in remedy case
Kevin Murphy, a University of Chicago professor testifying for Microsoft in the antitrust hearing, acknowledged that papers he wrote about the software industry were partially funded by the software company.
http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO70251_NLTAM%2C00.html