Hi, Morsal Roudbay wrote:
Cant say no to that Jerry, but is it reasonable to spend days fixing something that takes a few hours max on Windows? (reffering to the summary) That is simply unacceptable in my opinion.
I beg to disagree. In Win$, you have either fast and easy, if you stick with very limited in functionality and very unstable Win95-ME, or you have slow and tedious (if not virtually impossible) but stable and functional NT-W2K. "Hardware not supported by NT." Anyone heard that? "Sorry, you need to upgrade (for $1000), in order to do that." At least that's my experience from NT/Win$. Plus their tech support knew less than I (a layman) about their own SW. Habit is probably one of the strongest addictives there are. And that along with the glossy surface is what tricks one into believing Windoze is good. Only thing that keeps me stuck with M$ is file compatibility and specialized SW outside my direct control. If I had the money I've lost due to Windoze downtime and data loss paid in a batch payment, I could probably get some nice SW of my own done for that money. Sometime in the near future I'm going to get SuSE installed in my old mothers computer. BR, Gudmund