On Thursday 05 April 2001 10:13, Jon Clausen wrote:
O.K. I don't think I sent you any messages Corvin, but I assume it's because people *just* reply to messages, not checking where they're going?
Anyway: Would it not be feasible for postmaster@suse (or whoever) to set it up so invalid adresses get filtered out of the adresslist? Or rather: I presume it's already set up, so maybe the question would be "why don't it work in this case?"
Because the TO: field contains email address that don't require passing though SuSE's maillist server.
<flamebait> I mean, this is ridiculous... When you sign up for the list, a valid email-adress is mandatory, is it not? IMO it should be. And don't new subscribers get verification, by email? And if *that* one bounces, surely it makes no sense adding that adress on the list??? I mean - I do *not* want to set up filters for this... </flamebait>
my .005$
BTW: Any luck Jeffrey?
Jon Clausen
On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:58, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:48:38 -0400
Corvin Russell
wrote: I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
I think we get the message.
Geoff
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com