O.K. I don't think I sent you any messages Corvin, but I assume it's because people *just* reply to messages, not checking where they're going? Anyway: Would it not be feasible for postmaster@suse (or whoever) to set it up so invalid adresses get filtered out of the adresslist? Or rather: I presume it's already set up, so maybe the question would be "why don't it work in this case?" <flamebait> I mean, this is ridiculous... When you sign up for the list, a valid email-adress is mandatory, is it not? IMO it should be. And don't new subscribers get verification, by email? And if *that* one bounces, surely it makes no sense adding that adress on the list??? I mean - I do *not* want to set up filters for this... </flamebait> my .005$ BTW: Any luck Jeffrey? Jon Clausen On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:58, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:48:38 -0400
Corvin Russell
wrote: I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
I think we get the message.
Geoff
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com