Hello all, I've been a SuSE user since 4.something and in many ways feel as though I've learnt linux with it. Every now and again I trot off and try another distro (RH, debian, slack -etc.) and always wind up coming back to SuSE. but.... It seems to me there is room for little organisational improvement. Here we are again with 6.4 soon to be on the market (the german version - is in the shops already)and nothing on the ftp-site (just a basic 6.4 iso eval would do). Can anyone tell me why it's so difficult to track down usefull info on the website? And why is the dir layout different on SuSE? It takes a fair bit of time changing conf files and makefiles to make things fit the SuSE way and I for one find it a drag. And if I wanted to be swap CD's at boot time - I'd become a DJ. - and why no qmail.rpm (I know... but the choice would be nice) I don't want this to sound like a big rant but sometimes it drives me nuts.. and it seems to have more to do with direction than anything else. Do the SuSE management team know where they want to position the product because it seems to me SuSE is turning into a "workstationy-server" sort of distribution. Is there an argument for a Pro-SuSE-server and a workstation version? As always, when I need to remember all the niggles - I never can. But that's not the point... I like SuSE, always have and probably always will - I like it's logical style and the list is always populated by thinkers who want to help. Security fixes are always quick and the releases always usable - so it's not the product. It's the marketing and positioning of it. Comments appreciated - but no point in flaming 'cos I'm a fan.. bye Andy ------------------------------- This mail was sent using ecmail -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/