Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2005 18:22 schrieb Stefan Dirsch:
Did you read /usr/share/doc/packages/fglrx/README.SuSE?
No. There was no note at the installation README, that I've to read this.
If you rely on such programs you might consider to add "/usr/lib/fglrx/lib" to your /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you insert it before /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 on AMD64.
/lib and /usr/lib are trusted directories and by default not at /etc/ld.so.conf but also searched by ldconfig (after reading /etc/ld.so.conf). BTW: There's a include at /etc/ld.so.conf. So you may simply add a fglrx.conf with contents /usr/lib/fglrx/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/. AFAIK this could be better than adding a fglrx.{sh|csh} so /etc/profile.d. On may own machine LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set up, but glxinfo still reported the mesa indirect drivers. So it seams, that LD_LIBRARY_PATH was not searched (maby because a libGL.so was found in the ld.so.cache)? Markus