6 Nov
2015
6 Nov
'15
07:31
On Thu, Nov 05, PGNet Dev wrote:
For other Leap repos being activated, the naming convention appears to be:
.../openSUSE_Leap_42.1
(1) Should the Virtualization repo be similarly named?
The repository of non-home:* repos have various names: 125 openSUSE_Leap_42.1 37 openSUSE_42.1 8 openSUSE_42 1 openSUSE_Leap_42_1 1 openSUSE_Leap_42.1_PowerPC 1 openSUSE_Leap_42.1_Ports
(2) Can whatever the correctly-named repo is to be get activated/populated?
Yes. Olaf -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-virtual+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-virtual+owner@opensuse.org