25 Oct
2002
25 Oct
'02
15:40
As in the ssh case nothing exactly is been said on the vulnerability of the kernel.
Unlike the ssh case, this is a political issue. People do not want to be held liable by the US government for violating the DMCA. Personally, I don't think it's very likely, but some people are getting increasingly nervous about how this obscenely flexible law is being used recently. I can't find the list of issues ATM but those I remember were not really earth-shattering -- no remote kernel exploits or similar. Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | Anyone who has had to work with X.509 has probably okir@suse.de | experienced what can best be described as ---------------+ ISO water torture. -- Peter Gutmann