Yeah, I know. You just proved what I thought was correct..everything
before 6.0 was libc5..6.0 was glibc ;)
* Roman Drahtmueller (draht@suse.de) [020226 06:13]:
->Hi Ben!
->
->>
->> Nope, 6.0 was glibc I believe...anything prior to it was libc5.
->>
->
->Ack. From http://www.suse.de/de/support/security/2001_046_glibc_txt.html :
->
->Overview:
->
-> dist | source-RPM | shared libs | static libs,header| profiling
->
->-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-> 6.4,7.0 libc shlibs libc libd
-> 7.1,7.2,7.3 glibc glibc glibc-devel glibc-profile
->
->
->6.4 and 7.0 have a glibc-2.1.3,
->7.1 has glibc-2.2,
->7.2 has glibc-2.2.2,
->7.3 has glibc-2.2.4
->
->The old 6.0 and 6.1 versions had a glibc-2.0, 6.2 and on were the first
->ones with a 2.1 glibc.
->
->Thanks,
->Roman.
->--
-> - -
->| Roman Drahtmüller