* Sebastian J. Bronner wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:23 -1000:
On Monday 28 January 2002 00:34, you wrote:
Sebastian J. Bronner wrote (on 27 Jan 2002 at 21:29):
I have a problem that I haven't seen addressed in the archives.
I have configured my gateway computer according to the Scenario 3 (a small university wants to use masquerading to provide internet access to its internal network) in the EXAMPLES file with the following settings:
FW_DEV_EXT="eth0:0" FW_DEV_INT="eth0"
Did you tried: FW_DEV_EXT="eth0" FW_DEV_INT="eth0" ?
Yes, it does. I know that this isn't an optimal configuration, as it can lead to traffic collisions, but it should still work (as it has in the past).
Really cool statement, plugging the internal network into the big bad internet, configuring a firewall with a single network card and finally think about traffic collisions... hum. In your case, I would set up masq by IP range, not by interface. I don't know what SuSEfirewall does. oki, Steffen -- Dieses Schreiben wurde maschinell erstellt, es trägt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.