30 Nov
2000
30 Nov
'00
16:43
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:11:46PM +0100, Thomas Michael Wanka wrote:
last time I checked, sendmail was said to need a very good configuration to be treated as secure (I lost the references that gave me that impression). Qmail is much more easy to configure (to me). That is why I treat it as more secure. I do not fear sendmail itself, but my inability to configure it correctly. Ease of use can be treated as a gain of security.
What I love is when people stand behind other peoples opinions over what is secure. How many people have actually audited the source code running on their system that they claim is "secure". -miah