On 03/28/2012 10:51 AM, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 27 mars 2012, à 15:53 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu a écrit :
elections, so that everyone can vote, even if he does not like the candidates.
Again one is tied to voting whatever the way the above is phrased. Choosing to vote or not to vote is a personal choice and should not be tied to the person being active or passive.
I'd be interested if you could elaborate on why a "none of them" option is different from not voting at all, if the personal choice is to not vote. Is it a matter of wording (would a "I don't want to vote" option be better?) or is it something else?
Let me put it this way when there is an election in a state, country or whatever a person who has the right to vote but not willing to vote needs not to go to the polls and tell the election officials that he/she is not exercising his/her voting right. So why do we want to do the uncommon here the other way that I do not understand. The actual question to be asked in my point of view is how do we go on with acquisition and retention. However the approach taken till now has been far away from these two concerns but concentrated on the detention process. I do not think this is the right way to go Togan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org