On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Pascal Bleser
On 2012-01-23 17:46:12 (-0600), Bryen M Yunashko
wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 23:32 +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote: [...] Maybe Studio guys figured it was okay to use Packman, but only if you don't make it publicly available via the Gallery? Or only if the builder makes sure to not include patent-infringing packages regardless of public or private consumption. (But how does the average builder know which package is "verboten"?)
True, that is probably allowed: building with Studio but not hosting it in the Studio Gallery.
That means that it would require some infrastructure of its own, at the very least to host the images.
[...]
Maybe if the repository gets included but the softwate with the patent problems isn't installed by default then it shouldn't be a legal problem, but I am not really sure about it. The other thing that was discussed in the oSC in September was the pattern thing. For starters we could create a pattern including all audio related software or at least a choice of audio applications. Then with a 1-click installer it should be really easy to transform the default installation to an audio installation. That as a fist step. Then we can see how that goes and proceed with a spin. cu, efagra -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org