On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 23:13 +0200, Stathis Iosifidis (aka diamond_gr) wrote:
Στις 23/01/2012 09:30 μμ, ο/η jdd έγραψε:
Le 23/01/2012 20:24, Bryen M Yunashko a écrit :
I think the question JDD is trying to raise is whether packages that may not meet US legal snuff and are in Packman can be installed into a Studio image without repercussions to the SUSE Studio hosters.
yes, mostly
I would personally say "yea" but I'm not qualified to answer that specific question.
I would also, but fear attachmate wont :-(
and I mean: wont be able to, nothing about willingness there
Place holders are there in this purpose: allow install, dependency solving, but after that an update to packman is necessary.
And I'm sure Pascal will love to have more help :-))
jdd I'm not sure what they use. It's also Ubuntu Studio http://ubuntustudio.org/
Regarding legal issues, SUSE Studio has a section that let's you add a licence, right? We can use that.
The license would only be for the compilation of the overall respin and anything original you add to it. Software you install from repos already have their licenses. But the issue isn't licensing, its the patent issues within the US and whether SUSE Studio servers are affected by US laws. That's why the software examples were pointed out by JDD that cannot currently be in an OBS repository, so they are in Packman repository to avoid US legal issues, as one of the reason.
A good "moto" is: openSUSE Studio with SUSE Studio
Or openSUSE Jam? :-)
;-)
Have a lot of fun!!!
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org