Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
No it is not, and you are missing the whole point of the discussion as evidenced by several of your previous posts.
The main goal here is to encourage an foster an environment that is welcoming and inviting to people of all races, creed, gender and physical abilities.
Don't we already have such an environment? If yes, is it in danger of deteriorating?
An anti-harassment policy is but one of the pieces necessary to make it clear to our community that we welcome diversity.
Unless there are indications to the contrary in our community or common culture, I don't see why there is a need to say so.
Other steps need to be taken, including proclaiming directly that we embrace diversity and putting words into actions that encourage diversity. One such method is to ensure that our CFP process encourages it. And myself and Alan Clark, both members of the CFP commmittee, have now stated within the thread here that we will do so.
Surely you also need to listen to the community and act as the representatives of that?
Clearly by stating what you just said you have actually supported my case. You have obviously very little personal experience being part of an affected community that experiences harassment (and
discrimination) on a regular basis as a way of life.
Please stop making invalid assumptions and being arrogant and offensive. Your tone is entirely inappropriate. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (19.5°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org