Jim Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:26:46 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
track number of changes per subsystem, as well as number of bugs reported. Could be further qualified with severities, amount of activity, reason for closing etc.
You would probably also want to identify differences between changes introduced as enhancements vs. changes introduced to fix defects. Just saying that a subsystem hasn't changed isn't good if it could be enhanced and made better.
Jim
Yes, absolutely, changes ought to be qualified just as bugs are. There are also significant, revolutionary changes such as rsyslog, systemd, plymouth, mariadb, libreoffice and plymouth that would/could be counted differently. I'm not sure how we get control or stats of the changes that are happening, but that might have to wait until we can say "we need better change control in order to have better quality management". -- Per Jessen, Zürich (9.9°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org