On 21/01/2011 17:42, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Am 21.01.11, 17:14 +1100 schrieb Basil Chupin:
On 21/01/2011 16:31, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Am 21.01.11, 15:46 +1100 schrieb Basil Chupin:
On 21/01/2011 00:11, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Am 20.01.11, 14:02 +0100 schrieb jdd:
Le 20/01/2011 13:36, Kai-Uwe Behrmann a écrit :
> Gnokii was not just a member who was removed, he is a nominated > candidate for the board election [2].
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election#Nominations:
as far as I know, he was only nominated by Nelson (and I didn't see this on any official mailing list) and during the discussion Nelson never reported this (although the discussion was so long I may have missed the fact), and we have no evidence gnokii was a candidate. However, Nelson was (is).
Here are references: http://karl-tux-stadt.de/ktuxs/?p=2971 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2011-01/msg00013.html
I don't want to start again the discussion on the other aspects of this problem.
Sorry, if I just repeated things.
Well, from where I sit all conditions for nomination to be a candidate in the current election for the Board have been met.
The person, S Kemter (aka Gnokii), was nominated and as per the requirements:
Nominations:
The election committee will take self-nominations, nominations by others and can nominate people for election. The election committee will contact the nominated people and ask them whether they are willing to stand for election. These nominations are private until accepted by the nominated people.
was approached by Thomas Schmidt by e-mail to which S Kempter responded that he had accepted the nomination and gave the URL of his blog where he states that he will be atanding for the Board.
The obvious thing is, S Kempter announced his confirment on 3th Januar on this very list and was removed on 4th January by the board.
Unfortunately, and regrettably, I overlooked that message and have also cleared my deleted messages so I have to take your word for this (unless you care to post a copy in this list for not only myself but others to see if they also overlooked it or I go looking in the archives....).
For your convenience the candidates confirming email: From: "S.Kemter"
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 23:22:10 +0100 Hi,
Am Donnerstag 16 Dezember 2010, 11:35:00 schrieb Thomas Schmidt:
Hi Sirko!
You have been nominated by Nelson Marques to run for a position in the openSUSE board. [1] The board has 2 seats to be elected in january 2011. [2]
This is your chance to have a major word in leading the openSUSE project. It would be great if you step up for candidacy!
I already have thaught about it.
To do so, please announce your candidacy until January 4th. [3]
and published my candidacy already in my personal blog.
http://karl-tux-stadt.de/ktuxs/?p=2971
If you have any questions, please contact the election committee at: election-officials@xxxxxxxxxxxx and we will gladly help you.
Greetings
[1] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board [2] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election_2010 [3] http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election_2010#Phase_0:_Notification_ of_Intent_to_Run
Greetings
br gnokii --
Disclaimer: quotation is by hand from internet.
Aaaargh! :-[ Mea culpa.... I didn't look closely enough at the reference which you provided earlier and in which you quoted the response from Gnokii to the e-mail from Schmidt (in http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2011-01/msg00013.html).
Why did the election commite not protest upon its competence violation?
Don't ask me - the members of the current Board and the election committee would need to answer this. It would be good to get a transparent information, who in the board voted for the candidates membership removal and who not.
kind regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann
BC -- "To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge." Confucius -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org