On Monday 04 October 2010 17:30:04 Administrator wrote:
I'm concerned that two sets of rules in here conflict, and there needs to be a statement of priority. There are rules which reduce the number of elected people (no more than 40% to one organisation) and rules to ensure enough people get elected. They could conflict, i.e. by applying the 40% rules there are too few electable candidates and so the election cannot be held. Do we hold the election anyway (because it's better to have a board than no board) or try to get more candidates (because it's most important to ensure no one organisation has control)?
I would to try to get more candidates first and then hold the elections - and then we might need to appoint some people, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org