Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:57 AM Thorsten Kukuk
wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, Neal Gompa wrote: [...]
Why are you ghosting files in a location on tmpfs?
I'm not doing this, I even think it is plain wrong, but the openSUSE packaging policies and rpmlint checks suggests/requests/requires this. Please make yourself aware of the current usage of tools and policies.
I guess if you ghost them, then it'd get deleted on rpm uninstall, but it's still weird. If you used %tmpfiles_remove, would we need to ghost tmpfiles?
Ghost files also make rpm -qf show something. The scope of tmpfiles has expanded over time and seems to be used for all kinds of things. So %ghost may be more useful for some entries than others. I wish the tmpfiles mechnism was more integrated into rpm or provided by rpm itself to avoid those scriptlets in the first place. Functional packaging ftw :-) cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org