On 30/08/17 02:26, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
I had a very similar situation with the program hollywood, see https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/utilities/hollywood The artwork is CC0 and the code is Apache-2.0.
Are other distros shipping this package? If yes, how are they dealing with it?
Sebastian
Debian didn't ship Firefox as Firefox for a number of years for a similar kind of reason (you couldn't modify its logo) but I guess they had slightly different wording in there licenses as we didn't seem to have an issue.
On 08/29/2017 06:37 PM, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to get a package into Factory but legal says there's a problem with the embedded proprietary artwork licensing terms. Said material is indispensable to the program.
Upstream tells me they could relicense it under CC-BY-ND-4.0, with the rest of the code being GPL-3.0 or LGPL-3.0: were this the case, would Factory accept it?
Regards
-- View this message in context: http://opensuse.14.x6.nabble.com/Mixed-license-problem-tp5094424.html Sent from the opensuse-packaging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B