Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (127 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse-packaging] Re: Mixed license problem
Stephan Kulow-3 wrote
Sorry, but CC0 is not the same situation as CC-BY-ND. CC0 is basically
public domain while ND is not open source.

I thought ND was nonfree, but not necessarily closed source.


Stephan Kulow-3 wrote
Am 29.08.2017 um 19:16 schrieb Luigi Baldoni:

I understand that, but are there hard rules in that regard?

Yes, there are rules:
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_guidelines#Code_vs_Content

I read that and I'm still nowhere near clarity in regard to my original
question.
The content is not religious nor pornographic, just nonfree. Does that
make it "open source compatible"?

Because according to FSF it's compatible with GPL-3.0:
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/cc-by-4-0-and-cc-by-sa-4-0-added-to-our-list-of-free-licenses
.

Regards




--
Sent from: http://opensuse.14.x6.nabble.com/opensuse-packaging-f3359936.html
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >