Le mercredi 25 novembre 2015 à 05:34 -0500, Felix Miata a écrit :
Takashi Iwai composed on 2015-11-25 04:52 (UTC-0500):
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:43:39 +0100,
Petr Gajdos wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:11:37AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
It's unfortunate that the package names don't end in -fonts like all other font packages.
Indeed, this must be an overlook. Petr, any reason to keep them without the -fonts suffix?
I do not think so. Look at changes in M17N:fonts/google-noto -fonts and feel free to amend/submit.
While we're at it: should we keep the whole prefix google-*? That is, whether google-noto-emoji-fonts or noto-emoji-fonts. I think the latter is enough, but the former is clearer that it's a subpackage of google-noto-fonts.
Why is the string google- in any font package name? Are any of Google's fonts called by fontconfig using string "google-"? I wish openSUSE (DW#4)[1] would align with what other major distros do. Archlinux (DW#9), Linuxmint (DW#1), Ubuntu (DW#3) & Debian (DW#2) all omit string google- from noto font package names.
And Fedora doesn't.. Seriously, who care ? Each distribution has its own guidelines.. -- Frederic Crozat Enterprise Desktop Release Manager SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org