This avoids the doubt weather a license string of some sub package was forgotten or intentionally implicit. Coolos new logic appears to actually create more of this doubt, if I get it right.
Yes, that's a good suggestion as well.
Btw, a general rule to follow should be that the formatter should only do transformations that a subsequent changed formatter can undo. Thus, throwing away information isn't ok - like in this case. As I only remove duplicated information that can be readded without a
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011, 11:47:31 schrieb Richard Guenther: problem I don't see a problem. Greetings, Sephan -- Sent from openSUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org