* Cristian Rodríguez
El 21/11/10 09:16, Guido Berhoerster escribió:
vim seems to use some clever optimizations for memory management which break with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 so in this case it seems justified to replace it with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 as recommended by upstream.
In case this code is really correct (?) only the affected unit, may be built with "1" NOT the whole package !
Have you read the referenced mail? This is not only about the warnings, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 actually breaks the code in at least one case and obviously has not been tested with it. It also tries to obscure what it does from gcc but obviuosly fails at it. P.S: I'm not trying to defend this kind of coding... -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org