On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:10:03AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
On 2010-11-15 14:41:50 (+0100), Petr Uzel
wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Montag 15 November 2010 schrieb Jean Delvare:
I pretty much doubt you want to move less out of Base:System, given that man depends on it.
What definition of Base:System is that statement based on? man depends on _tons_ of things not in Base:System.
I just created request to delete less from utilities - let it stay in Base:System only.
Couldn't we use utilities/less as a devel for Base:System/less ? (or is Base:System already the devel project for Factory ?)
That being said, I would personally feel a bit uncomfortable doing SRs for Base:System, as it sounds like it is a very critical project which needs very conservative handling (of new versions and such). Or is that just an impression? :)
My point is that we might be able to maintain a "latest and greatest" less in utilities, rather than in Base:System. Well... if "latest and greatest" applies to less in the first place.. erm... probably not.
But coolo wants Base:System to become smaller, so why move less back into Base:System now ?
Let's please clarify that with coolo first :)
As "man" does not require specific version of less to build, I see no issues of "less" living somewhere else. Base:System is also not a backports repository. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org