Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (109 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] libfoo-util , libfoo-bin or libfooN-[util|bin] ?
  • From: Michael Matz <matz@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:40:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710121240130.23011@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:

> > libfoo-tools - at least that is what has the most existing packages 
> > (the -tools suffix).
> 
> True, but interestingly Novell employees don't seem to like those since 
> for 10.3 I know of one being merged to the library package for a 
> non-reason :-(

Which one?  Because normally that would be against the lib policy (having 
binaries in the libbla2.rpm).


Ciao,
Michael.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups