Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (49 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpmlint checks in Factory
  • From: Daniel Bornkessel <dbornkessel@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:44:34 +0200
  • Message-id: <200706010944.34699.dbornkessel@xxxxxxx>
On Friday 01 June 2007 09:34:39 Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > There are new, considered to be experimental, checks for rpmlint
> > diagnostics in Factory. So far, the following checks are enabled:
> >
> > arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share 590
> > infopage-not-gzipped 540
> > wrong-script-interpreter  533
> > arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object 499
> > library-without-ldconfig-postun 400
> > shlib-with-non-pic-code 223
> > files-duplicated-waste 100
> > summary-not-capitalized 63
> > spurious-executable-perm 50
> > devel-file-in-non-devel-package 50
> > wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding 1
>
> Can you add some explanation what these checks do? (code is also OK)
>
> I'm especially interested in spurious-executable-perm, but some of the
> others aren't self-explaining also.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Christian Boltz

Hi Christian.
See http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint#spurious-executable-perm

Perhaps at the end of a build with rpmlint warnings or errors, a the reference 
to

http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint ;

should be given as I think a lot of people will ask about rpmlint errors.

Best,
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
List Navigation
References