~/bin/filelist-10.3 /work/built/dists/all/x86_64/packs-x86_64/libelf ... checking filelist
~/bin/filelist-10.3 /work/built/dists/all/x86_64/packs-x86_64/libapparmor ... checking filelist
This is a patch against filelist-10.3 to verify that (parts of) the proposed library packaging policy are followed. It's non-fatal right now as nearly every package fails it :P A few examples: libelf: "/usr/lib64/libelf.so" is not allowed in a non-devel package WARNING: Your package would fail here! libelf: "/usr/lib64/libelf.so.0" should be in a lib package with the .so version 0 appended, like libelf0 libelf: "/usr/lib64/libelf.so.0.8.9" should be in a lib package with the .so version 0 appended, like libelf0 libapparmor: "/lib64/libapparmor-2.0-45.so.1" should be in a lib package with the .so version 1 appended, like libapparmor1 libapparmor: "/lib64/libapparmor.so.1" should be in a lib package with the .so version 1 appended, like libapparmor1 libapparmor: "/lib64/libimmunix.so.1" should be in a lib package with the .so version 1 appended, like libapparmor1 libapparmor: "/usr/lib64/libapparmor.so" is not allowed in a non-devel package WARNING: Your package would fail here! But of course we also have conforming packages!
~/bin/filelist-10.3 /work/built/dists/all/x86_64/packs-x86_64/libapr1 ... checking filelist
Can we enable this in BETA now and STABLE soon?
Thanks,
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther