Johannes Meixner wrote:
I do not have the time to write no comments!
Reason: When I work some time later again on the package I might perhaps not remember every detail why I did what and then my comments save my time.
So, you're telling us, that because someone might not remember (or understand) an obvious removal, any packager needs to comment in future any removal, even the obvious ones? Come on... It's not just about remembering, it's even about understanding. So, is this rule introduction "any removal needs a mandatory comment in future" an advantage or a hindrance? I think no need of such an rule is the better way, because then there is even no rule to hide important comments through overloading the specfile with non-important ones. I think every packager should still be able to decide on his own if it is necessary to have a comment for an "rm" or not. Programing obvious things without a need to comment is sometimes an advantage. There should be no such automatic testing. Regards, Klaus. -- Klaus Singvogel SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 E-Mail: Klaus.Singvogel@SuSE.de 90409 Nuernberg Phone: +49 (0) 911 740530 Germany GnuPG-Key-ID: 1024R/5068792D 1994-06-27 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org