-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/9/15 3:56 PM, Dirk Müller wrote:
Hi,
It's been 5 days and I haven't seen any review for this. Is it because there are no objections?
From the patch:
-CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ=y +CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ=m
I think this is specifically a revert of a recent commit. As far as I know we have debugged this several times already and the exynos cpufreq driver does not work when used as a module. It should be mentioned in the commit log on why it is safe to have that set as a module (and why every other cpufreq driver is still compiled in). Also imho CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS7_DECON should not be set on ARMv7.
Other changes look good to me.
Thanks. I've applied with your changes and added a reviewed-by tag for you. BTW, is this intended? - -# CONFIG_SND_SOC_RT5677_SPI is not set +CONFIG_SND_SOC_RT5677=m +CONFIG_SND_SOC_RT5677_SPI=m - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU/gFTAAoJEB57S2MheeWyZVkP/0U7S6TThrwuR1yJ+nHntRrt K0HfOT3qOkdIjBCyOjV2U66OWuT7nJYYhwuZ4hsk/TGuQ9WPLzmjHor5y85AemOn Z4xvfm7O7pVWjgSrLWJYFER5LO6v/9aObRI2f6uZ7HT2/6AFqrIn8tPkgzC0YLvF 5bfg/GsO3+NVVgDD02JMoYGlAk6NJ1Bo4pL1QHS9rIGIqxzqGbrkMnEzCy/GIuZi 2v09x2bBIQl8UdH5qVdOdqMWgUDwg/dqNqnU/Gn92+lzcvHpweOQdS7JqLQ4drv8 3+v4/sp4H90GhwLqQt2Ag0NC/XBnKECwKo85kCOS/8V4lXr+sgrgkVuBKkg+lQm9 TLyRdFVGw3UMUmESGf8qbY/nWSabLST3R05ehvliT/zMYrTonFuYd0EBkJ82yazN IIbhTq/DGp+LsCmPMXrpPSJEm7w+iCxXchjmfELR01cBOjlbihRHYqevt36Wf342 0XFKfw9AXfKVOnDl9q6SlsEo/WzCLAIym2flCJ3eKH1VmWXb4z5F6c8Zlu/fT0v0 HT8RFOu+nrijoNwmQGi+NFMZGPhx0Uz1GtHpddFh3Pv8ZtarNjfkNT84AgQCilpk 7omJuXZ4ScarB324Z42PQz0nWHaIKO6Aq3l91qI8cn3+Xu5fYKdAe5P1/RY/M/fG WpuWox9LM9xrq57vdMMF =F1T8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org