On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:20 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
writes: IF this is to remain SIGBUS, then I don't think it's (anymore) in scope of libsigsegv to catch it and offer a handler for it, in which case removing the test would be the logical step; but I don't know what all else we might break with that.
If libsigsegv can no longer detect stack overflow it becomes pointless.
I looked a bit deeper in its code... seems there are similar such
things already done for Mac-OS and other platforms (hurd, Macos, ...)
I patched signals.h to have it handle SIGBUS the same way as it does for
those platforms now... first tests build already again.
--
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger